Thursday, March 01, 2012
Wednesday, February 01, 2012
Sunday, January 01, 2012
Thursday, December 01, 2011
Whither radiation? Whither house sparrows?
This post a-like was started some years ago. I'm sorry I hardly find house sparrows these days.
Any thoughts?
Any thoughts?
Tuesday, November 01, 2011
Saturday, October 01, 2011
Thursday, September 01, 2011
Monday, August 01, 2011
Does patenting mean you are owning it for good? Discuss with regards to Open Access
Today, we have an option called Semi-Open Access. Right?
Friday, July 01, 2011
Wednesday, June 01, 2011
Biologists to safe-guard environment?
What would be your role as a Biologist to oversee safe environment ( June 5 is World Environment day)
Please comment
Please comment
Sunday, May 01, 2011
Biologists and Bioinformaticists for Cloud
Dear All,
Do you think setting up and working in Cloud computing would be benefactor for Biologists?
What do yo think are the challenges posed?
Do you think setting up and working in Cloud computing would be benefactor for Biologists?
What do yo think are the challenges posed?
Friday, April 01, 2011
BioWikis: should there be any consortium?
It's been often observed that many Bio-wikis are in motion now. Shouldn't there by any consortium to set up non redundancy?
Tuesday, March 01, 2011
Tuesday, February 01, 2011
Mass fauna deaths: Cataclysm or contamination?
What could be the reason for recent mass fauna deaths? Please opine
Saturday, January 01, 2011
Wednesday, December 01, 2010
Open Access : To what extent?
Many scientists who respect Open Access (OA) policy end up paying huge open access fee by publishing their research in OA journals. The end-user in turn reads the article for free and thereby gains knowledge. It's cyclic. To what extent the OA is/should be made open ?
Discuss!
Discuss!
Monday, November 01, 2010
Too many Bioinformatics software? How to choose and take home a very good tool?
Bioinformatics mesmerizes us these days. I recall there weren’t many tools a decade ago. But today there are umpteen tools all over the web that are available for the community. It’s really a daunting and a challenging task to choose the one that fits for your research. The following steps may be followed on how to choose a tool
1. Understand the algorithm and intricacies behind the functioning of tool. This will help you to understand if the tool you are to work would solve the purpose. If needed discuss with your colleagues on questions/issues pertaining to it.
2. Always try to comprehend the advantages and pitfalls; understand if the tool has a tendency of being novel.
3. Always try to use a tool that has been tested/validated/trained on various datasets. Training and testing proves very important for the tool to have a high impact.
4. Always go through the entire article corresponding to the tool. If you have too many tools across the aspect you are searching, why don’t you just end up reading abstracts and conclusions of those articles and then sort your articles?
5. Understand the fundamental algorithms besides going into pertinent details/options/categories/tools. This would enable you to make the best choices for particular research interests.
6. The tool cited in a high impact journal doesn’t always necessarily mean that it is the best. You may try to use other tools and write pros and cons of all the tools across the features.
7. Finally, if you don’t like any feature, why don’t you make a high impact on that research in developing a tool? Of course, you need to be a smart bioinformaticist for that :-)
1. Understand the algorithm and intricacies behind the functioning of tool. This will help you to understand if the tool you are to work would solve the purpose. If needed discuss with your colleagues on questions/issues pertaining to it.
2. Always try to comprehend the advantages and pitfalls; understand if the tool has a tendency of being novel.
3. Always try to use a tool that has been tested/validated/trained on various datasets. Training and testing proves very important for the tool to have a high impact.
4. Always go through the entire article corresponding to the tool. If you have too many tools across the aspect you are searching, why don’t you just end up reading abstracts and conclusions of those articles and then sort your articles?
5. Understand the fundamental algorithms besides going into pertinent details/options/categories/tools. This would enable you to make the best choices for particular research interests.
6. The tool cited in a high impact journal doesn’t always necessarily mean that it is the best. You may try to use other tools and write pros and cons of all the tools across the features.
7. Finally, if you don’t like any feature, why don’t you make a high impact on that research in developing a tool? Of course, you need to be a smart bioinformaticist for that :-)
Friday, October 01, 2010
Wednesday, September 01, 2010
Should a graduate student be allowed to mentor students?
If so, could this be considered for the candidate's grade?
Sunday, August 01, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)